Functioning of Dr Saeed challenged in High Court

Since 25 April 1993, his case was not forwarded before any promotion committee or any competent authority therefore he should be considered as associate professor and an employee of the Punjab government not that of the federal government. They said that only a federal employee could perform in a federal institute. They said as per practice an employee was sent on deputation for 3 years but not for a longer period as was done in Dr Saeed's case.
They said that under Section 6 (d) of the Sheikh Zayed Medical Institute Employees (Services Regulations, 1990) (amended), the employees on deputation would neither be regularised nor be placed on seniority list.
They maintained that despite the fact that respondent was not capable of functioning at the post because his personal likings and disliking had created a tense atmosphere at the institution that had not only made it difficult for some doctors to continue their jobs but patients were also facing lot of difficulties in getting proper treatment.
They said that the hospital management paid no heed to their regular complaints in this regard that compelled them (petitioners) to approach the LHC.
They prayed that Dr Saeed be asked to explain that under what law he was functioning on the post of professor and considering himself as a employee of federal government since last 18 years.
They also prayed that explanation from other respondents might be sought that under what law they had allowed him to function on the said post.