NEW DELHI (Agencies) Centres three interlocutors for Jammu and Kashmir have been able to change the discourse in the state, Indian Home Minister P Chidambaram said on Monday but asked the media to refrain from expecting a ball-by-ball commentary about the progress made in their dialogue, reports the Indian media. The remarks came a day after Dileep Padgaonkar, one of the three interlocutors, stirred a controversy following an announcement on TV that some Kashmiri fighters may present a peace plan to them on their next visit to the state. Padgaonkar told a TV channel that a member from a Kashmir group told them during their recent trip to the valley that they would like to submit a peace plan also to us. The three interlocutors - Padgaonkar, Radha Kumar and MM Ansari - were appointed by the Home Minister last month for a serious dialogue to find a political solution to the problems in the state rocked by violent protests since June. Presenting his Ministrys report for October, Chidambaram told reporters that after the recent visit of the all-party delegation to the state, There is a sense of expectation that the political problem of Jammu and Kashmir will be addressed in all seriousness. He said the interlocutors have, to some extent, changed the discourse in the state and I sincerely hope that the people in the state will give peace a chance and give dialogue a chance. However, there was a quick word of caution from the Indian Home Minister when he was asked about the claims made by one of the interlocutors about submission of a peace plan by a Kashmiri freedom fighters. I think media should not ask and interlocutors should not give a ball-by-ball commentary about their dialogue. This is interlocution. This is not a cricket match, he said. When it was noted that the statement was made by one of the interlocutors during a TV show, he said that is because you ask questions. The Indian Minister, who returned from the state Sunday evening, said that the situation in Kashmir where some 110 people have been killed, mostly in firing by security forces on protesters, was returning to normal - almost, adding that it is too early to say that everything is normal there. He said Delhi Police not filing a case against noted writer Arundhati Roy for her alleged seditious speech recently was in accordance with the letter and spirit of law. Not taking action is also an action, he shot back when a journalist asked him why the government was not acting against her for her Azaadi (independence) remarks made at a convention on Kashmir here recently. The Indian Minister said the government is pursuing American national David Headleys extradition who pleaded guilty to helping scout targets for the 2008 Mumbai attacks, ratcheting up a contentious issue days ahead of US President Obamas visit. [Extradition] is an option, and as I said we will continue to pursue that option, he told reporters, referring to Headley. He said the US has shared the name of Headley almost a year after the Nov 26, 2008 attacks. The US did share intelligence with us, in the months leading up to 26/11, although the name David Headley was not mentioned. After 26/11 also, the US has shared intelligence with us, and as I have said in the past, intelligence sharing between the two nations is extremely good. The name of David Headley was shared with us, I think, sometime in October 2009.