Recognise Palestinian Humanity

From the beginning, neither the British nor early Zionist leaders saw the indigenous Arab population as full human beings.

Guys in white shirts and ties in Washington and their coun­terparts in Israel are sitting around tables making plans for after Israel ends its genocidal assault on Gaza (if they ever end it). From what I’ve read, their plans are either cruelly insensitive or downright delusional, focusing only on who runs what and how it will be run, ignoring the wounds inflicted by this war that will define reality for a gen­eration or more. The loss and trauma inflicted on mil­lions of Palestinian victims are never factored into calculations by the Israelis or their enablers in Wash­ington. To them Palestinians have always been mere pawns on a chessboard.

Herein lies the root of the entire conflict. From the begin­ning, neither the British nor early Zionist leaders saw the indige­nous Arab population as full human beings. When learning of the British plans to secure a Mandate and turn it over to the Zionist movement for a Jewish colony in Palestine, the Americans sent a team to survey Arab opinion. They found near total Arab rejec­tion of both the Mandate and the Zionist enterprise. On hearing the results, the British Lord Balfour was quoted saying, “In Pales­tine, we do not propose…consulting the wishes of the present in­habitants of the country…Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is…of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.”

The founders of the Zionist movement shared this sentiment. They first sought “a land without a people…for a people without a land.” Upon finding natives there, Herzl wrote that they would be used to clear the area of dangerous animals, and then evacu­ated to other lands. Early Zionists wrote that the Jewish people were “more industrious and more able than the average Europe­an, not to speak at all of the inert Asiatic and African.” They be­lieved that their colony would be a “rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilization as opposed to barbarism.”

This deeply racist mindset found its best expression in the 1960 film “The Exodus” that transposed the American “cowboys and Indians” storyline onto the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—with Israelis as pioneers seeking freedom for their families, fac­ing hordes of savages who sought only to kill them. The conflict was reduced to “Israeli humanity versus the Palestinian prob­lem.” They needed a way to defeat or subdue the “problem” so Israeli humanity could realize their dreams.

Too many policymakers in Washington still have this lens. As they grieved with the Israelis over the October 7th trauma, they identified with Israelis as real people, while Palestinians remained an abstraction receiving little sympathy. It’s taken months for any real expressions of compassion for tens of thou­sands Palestinians dead and the attendant devastation of Pales­tinian homes and cities.

Early in this war, I spoke with a senior White House official who expressed his pain at October 7th’s horrors. I told him that I under­stood and asked him to also consider Palestinian trauma. He angri­ly dismissed my appeal as “whataboutism,” suggesting that my in­tent was to justify or diminish Israelis’ suffering. I reminded him that it wasn’t either Palestinian or Israeli suffering. It was both.

Five months later, with 32,000 dead Palestinians and Gaza on the brink of famine, the administration is finally paying atten­tion. But it’s too little, too late.

Despite the White House focus on the humanitarian crisis—lack of food, water, medicine, and housing—the deeper toll inflicted on Palestinians is still unappreciated. If they recognized the true toll, they wouldn’t be dropping boxed lunches from the sky or building a pier, nor thinking that a reformed Palestinian Authority doing Is­rael’s dirty work was an acceptable “day after” scenario.

If they saw Palestinians as equal human beings, they’d tell the Israelis to stop bombing, remove the block on UNWRA, and support a UN resolution to send international forces into Gaza and the West Bank, ending the illegal Israeli occupation of both. They’d set up an international relief and reconstruction effort to rebuild Gaza, and send in teams of doctors to address the war’s physical and psychological wounds. They would, in other words, demonstrate the sense of urgency, compassion, and care that human beings deserve.

Dr. James J. Zogby
The writer is the President of Arab American Institute.

ePaper - Nawaiwaqt