ISLAMABAD  -  Another senior judge of the Su­preme Court, Justice Ijazul Ahsan Thursday tendered his res­ignation.

Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, the other day, had resigned as the Supreme Court judge over the Supreme Judi­cial Council’s proceedings against him on charges of misconduct.

According to the resignation ad­dressed to President Dr Arif Alvi, Jus­tice Ahsan said: “I no longer wish to continue as a judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.” He also wrote; “I resign as per Article 206(1) of the Constitution with immediate effect.” The letter, however, did not mention a reason for the resignation.

Justice Ijaz, was heading a five-judge bench, which had declared that clause (d) of subsection (1) of Sec­tion 2 of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 (in both of its sub clauses (i) & (ii)) and subsection (4) of Section 59 of the said Act are ultra vires the Con­stitution and of no legal effect. It also declared that the trial of civilians, arrested aftermath of 9th May inci­dent, by military courts is null and void and ordered that they be tried by criminal courts established under the ordinary and/or special law.

Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan, being third in seniority list of Supreme Court judg­es on Thursday declined to be part of the SJC which heard complaints against Justice Naqvi in open court. He had also refused to join other members of the council on Nov 22, 2023, in the issuance of a fresh showcause notice to Justice Naqvi.

In his letter to the SJC members on Tuesday last, Justice Ahsan had regretted the hasty proceedings and that debate and discussion were non-existent and were not permitted during the ongoing coun­cil proceedings.

“Thus Nov 22, 2023 proceedings when the sec­ond show-cause notice was issued against Jus­tice Naqvi were completely devoid of any discus­sion or deliberation whatsoever,” he had said. This manner of proceedings has cast an unwelcome doubt over the whole process, therefore he dis­agreed with the process followed and the manner in which the proceedings were being conducted, Justice Ahsan explained.

Referring to the allegations in the complaint against the judge, the letter regretted these were utterly without merit or substance, both in law and even on a prima facie appraisal of the facts. The letter regretted that a reasoned and deliber­ative approach ought to have been adopted which would have prevented the council from falling into the error that was committed with the issuance of the show-cause notice. Justice Ahsan was part of the five-member bench that passed the judg­ment in the high-profile Panamagate case in 2017, which led to the disqualification of Nawaz Sharif, the then-prime minister. He was the monitoring judge to supervise and monitor the implementa­tion of the Panamagate case verdict.

Justice Ahsan assumed the position of chief jus­tice of the Lahore High Court on November 6, 2015. A year later, on June 28, 2016, he was elevat­ed to the position of judge in the Supreme Court.

On April 10, 2023, lawyer Sardar Salman Ah­mad Dogar had moved a reference before the SJC against Justice Ahsan and others. The complaint had alleged judicial misconduct on the part of for­mer CJP Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ahsan and oth­er SC judges The complainant based his reference on an alleged violation of the Code of Conduct for judges of the superior judiciary issued by the SJC on Sept 2, 2009.

On April 14, a complaint was filed in the SJC against eight SC judges hearing petitions challeng­ing a proposed law to curtail the powers of the CJP.

The reference, filed by lawyer Mian Dawood, had sought the removal of former CJP Bandial, Justice Ahsan and others over alleged misconduct and de­viation from the judges’ code of conduct.